September 01, 2015

Fiat Chrysler GM Merger?

Dana Mathewson

Hey guys, this is interesting!

"Sergio Marchionne, chief executive of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, is keeping up his campaign to merge the automaker with General Motors"

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 06:11 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.

August 31, 2015

Look Who's Coming to Dinner (with John Kerry)

William Been

In the above article on the Allen West website, you will find relationships that demonstrate how critical the defeat of the Democrat Party is to the future of our country, specifically as determined by global policies. The Obama puppet master (Soros) hosts a secretive dinner with Iranian officials and the Vietnam traitor John Kerry who somehow has become the U. S. senator from Massachusetts. This is the same Iranian official that we see yukking it up with Kerry while "negotiating" the infamous Iran agreement that would certainly boost the Caliphate objectives of the Iranian Islamic leaders.

Does it not strike anyone as being significant that Mohammed's stepson Hussein was killed in Sourthern Iraq where the Shiites from Iran are playing an instrumental role in the current conflict with ISIS which was declared to be the JV team by Barack Hussein Obama who appointed John Kerry? When did Barry Sartoro become Barack Hussein and why? Does nobody care?

It has become crystal clear that national elections are no longer simply a struggle between liberal and conservative principles. Rather, national elections are now a struggle for the freedom offered to American citizens under God versus the totalitarian tendencies of Marxism, Socialism, Communism, and radical Islam. When will people recognize this? What will it take?

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:51 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 2 kb.

Climate issues we do need to address

Paul Driessen

President Obama and his UN, Big Green and Climate Crisis Industry allies insist that we need to "fix our climate” – because carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions are overheating the planet and causing "unprecedented” weather, sea level and drought disasters. There isn’t an iota of truth to any of these assertions. From my perspective, what we DO need to fix is the climate of fraud and corruption in the global warming and renewable fuels bureaucracy and industry … and their destructive policies that kill jobs, dreams, birds, bats and people.

My article this week explores these issues, and offers solutions to the morass we have gotten ourselves into.

Climate issues we do need to address

We need to fix the climate of fraud, corruption, and policies that kill jobs, hope and people

Paul Driessen

Reeling stock markets across the globe hammered savings, pension funds, innovation and growth. US stocks lost over $2 trillion in market value in eight days, before rallying somewhat, while the far smaller Shanghai Composite Index lost $1 trillion in four days of trading, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Battered economies continue to struggle. Investment banks are pulling out of developing countries. An already exploding and imploding Middle East now confronts a nuclear arms race and human exodus.

Complying just with federal regulations already costs American businesses and families $1.9 trillion per year, the Competitive Enterprise Institute calculates. That’s more than all 2014 personal and corporate income tax receipts combined – and Obama bureaucrats issued 3,554 new rules and regulations last year.

EPA’s 2,691-page Clean Power Plan is designed to eliminate coal mining and coal-fired power plants – and minimize natural gas substitutes. The CPP requires that gas use can increase by only 22% above 2012 levels by 2022, and just 5% per year thereafter. On top of that, new natural gas-fueled generating units that replace coal-fired power plants absurdly do not count toward state CO2 reduction mandates.

That means millions of acres of new wind and solar installations that generate expensive, unreliable electricity – and survive only because of subsidies, tariffs, anti-fossil fuel mandates, and exemptions from endangered species, environmental impact and other requirements that block fossil fuel projects.

Anti-energy, anti-growth policies imposed in name of preventing "dangerous manmade climate change” impact everything we do. For minority, elderly and working class families, they bring soaring electricity costs, rising unemployment, unproductive lives on government assistance, diminished health and welfare, and shorter life spans. They hogtie economies and kill jobs, prolong and worsen economic quagmires, crush aspirations and opportunities, perpetuate poverty, and foster anger, unrest and conflict.

None of these hard realities seems to bother President Obama, though. In fact, he is determined to use the December climate conference in Paris to lock the United States into binding treaty commitments to slash the common folks’ fossil fuel use, CO2 emissions, economic growth and job creation even further.

Anyone who cares about living standards, lifting billions of people out of abject poverty, and reining in the power of unaccountable US, EU and UN bureaucrats needs to pay attention and get involved.

Earth’s climate is doing pretty much what it always has: responding to powerful natural forces, changing, and driving atmospheric patterns and weather events that benefit some, harm others and sometimes wreak devastation. It is not doing what gloom-and-doom computer models and headlines predicted.

We do not need to "fix” or "control” the climate. We couldn’t if we tried. We do need to fix the climate of fraud, corruption and destructive policies that kill jobs, dreams and people. We need to realize that most countries will not commit economic suicide. They may sign a climate treaty – but for reasons that have nothing to do with environmental protection … and only if their obligations are distant and ephemeral.

Mr. Obama has said from the outset that he would use executive decrees to "fundamentally transform” the United States and ensure that electricity prices "necessarily skyrocket.” He has kept his word.

He and his friends in the UN, EU, Big Green and Climate Crisis Industry have also made it clear that they intend to use the Paris conference to negotiate the future distribution of the world’s wealth and resources, determine what economic growth and living standards are "ecologically feasible,” and transform the global economic development model: replacing sovereign nations and free enterprise capitalism with global governance and decision-making based on "sustainable development” and "dangerous manmade climate change” mantras. 1992 climate conference organizers even said saving the world requires that they cause "industrialized civilization to collapse.” They intend to keep their promises.

Impoverished people in developing countries reject this agenda. They want sustained development, not sustainable development. They want decent jobs and modern houses, hospitals and living standards.

Thus, under the proposed Paris treaty, only developed countries will be required to slash fossil fuel use. "Poor” nations (including China, India, Brazil, Indonesia and Russia) will not be obligated to reduce their carbon-based energy use or carbon dioxide/greenhouse gas emissions by any specific amounts or dates – though some say they "intend to try” to reduce emissions or may present non-binding targets some years from now. Most will dramatically increase their oil, gas and coal use, and CO2/GHG emissions.

The real bribe to induce poor nations to sign a new treaty is a binding commitment that increasingly less developed, less energy-powered, less rich countries will give "poor” nations (or at least their ruling elites) $100 billion per year in climate adaptation, mitigation and reparation payments. That’s to cover damages that developed nations have supposedly inflicted on Earth’s climate. FRCs (Formerly Rich Countries) will also be required to give "poor” nations advanced energy and other technologies, at no cost.

Even more insane, the entire basis for this agenda, this treaty, these commitments and non-commitments, is bald assertions – driven by garbage in/garbage out computer models and deceptive, fraudulent science – that humanity faces "unprecedented” global warming, rising ocean, weather and other calamities.

About the only unprecedented event in the past century is that no category 3-5 hurricane has hit the USA in nearly a decade. Climate alarmists refuse to discuss that. Their other assertions are pure fiction.

Claims that 2014 was the "hottest year on record,” and July 2015 was "the hottest July” since "at least 1880,” are based on city and airport temperatures that are always several degrees higher than those at nearby rural sites. (Satellite data show no warming for 18 years.) The "superheated planet” alarums involve hundredths of a degree: less than the margin of error. They are based mainly on only 1,200 measuring stations for Earth’s entire surface – with few in the coldest regions, and millions of acres of missing data simply extrapolated from urban numbers. The "hottest ever” charade also assumes reliable temperature data exist for the entire USA and planet all the way back to 1880! It defies belief.

(For more examples of climate scare deceit, see Climate Hype Exposed, Heartland’s Top 10 Global Warming Lies, the Aussie temperature scam, the Gore-a-thon analysis, and much more.

Imagine your life without electricity, or only when it’s available, or costing so much you can’t afford it and your now-bankrupt former employer couldn’t afford either. Imagine the EPA and UN controlling the juice that powers everything in your life: transportation, manufacturing, communications, entertainment, life after dark, life in hot and cold weather, the enormous infrastructure and energy demands that feed your smart phone. No wonder Google scientists finally admitted renewable energy is a pipedream.

Too many environmental laws no longer focus on protecting the environment. They have become bureaucratic weapons to protect chosen industries and destroy those connected to carbon-based fuels.

Denying people access to abundant, reliable, affordable hydrocarbon energy is immoral – and often lethal. It is an unconscionable crime against humanity to implement policies that pretend to protect the world’s energy-deprived masses from hypothetical manmade climate dangers decades from now – by perpetuating energy deprivation, poverty, malnutrition and disease that kill millions of them tomorrow.

Letting this climate fear mongering continue also means fewer jobs, more welfare, lower living standards, and deteriorating health and welfare – except for ruling elites. But so far too few politicians, candidates, clergy and business leaders have shown the courage to speak out – even as every Democratic would-be successor to Mr. Obama seems hell-bent on going even further than he has on all these policies.

Our next president and congress must focus on job and economic growth, and overall human welfare. They must review and roll back destructive regulations, root out the fraud and corruption, and restore honesty, transparency and real science to our political and regulatory system.

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow, author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power - Black death, and coauthor of Cracking Big Green: Saving the world from the Save-the-Earth money machine.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:47 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1488 words, total size 11 kb.

O'Malley Says Dem Debates Rigged

Dana Mathewson

ALL the GOP candidates need to pick up on O'Malley's "immigrant hate" remark and throw it back in his face. Hard!

"Two top Democratic candidates in the 2016 White House race suggested Friday night that party leaders have rigged the debate schedule in favor of frontrunner Hillary Clinton"

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:46 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 56 words, total size 1 kb.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Opposes Obama Iran Deal

Dana Mathewson

Charming! Wasserman Schwantz goes against her own president! Will wonders never cease?

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:45 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 22 words, total size 1 kb.

Julian Assange Stalked by Drones

Dana Mathewson

Now, there's a clever use for a drone, wouldn't you say?

"Wikileaks founder Julian Assange fears he will be sent to the United States, where he could face the death penalty, and even worries that he will be targeted by a CIA drone."

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:44 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 51 words, total size 1 kb.

Europe to Check Bags on Trains

Dana Mathewson

Not enough. Background checks necessary to purchase rail tickets, sez I.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:43 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.

Obama Renames Mt. McKinley

Timothy Birdnow What's in a name? The names of things are important, a way a culture is defined. The naming of names determines who and what a nation is, and what it will become. Leftists often change names. They do this to change what a nation thinks, who a nation chooses to be. Thus St. Petersburgh became Leningrad. Not to be outdone, Barack Obama is officially changing the name of Mount McKinley to Denali. He doesn't want us thinking in terms of old dead Presidents. According to USA Today courtesy of Gateway Pundit: " President Obama’s three-day trip to Alaska this week will literally change the map of the nation’s 49th state. Mount McKinley — the 20,237-foot mountain and the tallest in North America — has been renamed Denali, as it was originally known by Alaska Natives before it was renamed to honor President William McKinley. The mountain, which sits in the 6 million-acre Denali national park, has been known as Denali in Alaska since 1975. Under an order signed by Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, the Denali name will also take effect for all federal usage and, therefore, on all official maps. The order was signed Friday, but the White House asked that it be announced Monday as part of Obama’s trip to Alaska to highlight the effects of climate change in the Arctic. The White House said the name change “recognizes the sacred status of Denali to generations of Alaska Natives.” End excerpt. This is what Obama meant by change. He seeks to obliterate the past, to rename and remake America into an alien nation, to eliminate the character of our country. What's next? Renaming Washington Central City? Re-chiseling Mt. Rushmore to change the statuary into Tecumseh, or Martin Luther King, or himself? Changing the name of St. Louis to Cahokia? Renaming a thing breaks it's continuity with the past. That is his ambition. Oh Brave New World!

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:38 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 324 words, total size 2 kb.

August 29, 2015

Immigration: The Refugee Scam

By Selwyn Duke

Jeb Bush has called illegal migration "an act of love.” And all over the West we see nations being loved to death, with endless human waves from Third World countries washing ashore. The results were predictable and are now plain: balkanization, riots, ethnic and racial strife and no-go areas in European lands. Yet we’re told that accepting what are "refugees” is a humanitarian imperative. Yet no one, it seems, points out an obvious fact, something that really is the crux of the matter.

If a stranger in need happens by your area and you’re a charitable sort, you may take him in for a time, feed him and provide other basic necessities.

You don’t generally make him an official part of your family and empower him to help decide on finances, what products to buy, how your kids will be educated and what values will prevail within your home.
The point? At issue in the current "refugee crisis” is not charity and the humane treatment of refugees. This isn’t only because most of the migrants in question may not even be refugees.
It’s because the issue is granting uninvited guests citizenship.

People talk about the financial burden of accommodating Third World migrants, largely because money (as opposed to national integrity) is all a demoralized and denationalized people think to discuss and because finances are a politically correct subject. But a national family can recover from devastated finances. It can’t recover from a destroyed national family.

I have  HYPERLINK "" \l "more" pointed out  HYPERLINK "" \l "more" again and  HYPERLINK "" \l "more" again and  HYPERLINK "" \l "more" again that the groups represented by virtually all illegal migrants and refugees — and  HYPERLINK "" \l "more" 85 percent of legal immigrants since 1965 — vote for socialistic candidates between 70 to 90 percent of the time upon being naturalized. Related to this but also generally overlooked is that the people  HYPERLINK "" \l "more" make the culture and government. Replace a Western people with Muslims or Mexicans and you no longer have Western civilization. You have Mexico Norte or Iran West.
Unfortunately, the granting of aid and the granting of citizenship have been so melded into one amorphous, superficially homogenous blob of bad policy that most people don’t even recognize they should be two distinct and seperate issues, as they have been through most of history.

Of course, this serves the Left's ends, The refugee crisis is framed as a battle between compassionate liberal's responding to desperate pleas and coin-counting, callous conservative reactionaries But

charitable motives animate the Left little, if at all. Liberals are  HYPERLINK "" notoriously tightfisted with (their own) charitable dollars; even more to the point, when a  HYPERLINK "" shipload of Jews fleeing Nazi persecution wanted safe haven in the US, leftist icon FDR turned it away. It’s one of those curious coincidences in history that the Left’s attitude toward refugees changed precisely when leftists discovered they could import voters who would empower them.

And does attaching something as a rider — citizenship — to charity aid the cause of charity? Are people more or less likely to offer charity to a person if the act begins and ends with charity, or if they must grant the individual some decision-making power in their home as well? That’s a package deal only a masochist could love.
So there’s an easy way to uncover liberals’ true motivations and whether they’re serious about charity for refugees. Make a simple offer: you’ll give bona fide refugees safe haven, and you’ll do your best to ensure they’re treated well. But there’s no citizenship. Ever. And they’ll be expected to eventually return to their homelands. See if the leftists bite…anything but your extended hand.

But liberals have already tipped their hand. Andrew Neather, a former adviser to ex-British prime minister Tony Blair,  HYPERLINK "" admitted in 2009 that one of the goals of the mass immigration authored by his Labour Party was "to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.” Barack Obama  HYPERLINK "" said in February he was "pretty optimistic” that because immigration was making the US "more of a hodgepodge of folks,” conservatism would be drowned out. Even more incredibly, there was  HYPERLINK "" this report, which tells us that "Obama’s amnesty plan is to use illegal aliens as ‘seedlings’…[who will] ‘navigate, not assimilate,’ as they ‘take over the host,’ create a ‘country within a country’ and start ‘pushing the citizens into the shadows,’” as I  HYPERLINK "" wrote in March. And a refugee scam is part of this: in order to get around immigration law and maximize Third World migration into the US, the Obama administration is categorizing as many people as possible as "refugees.”

This brings us to a contradiction here. On the one hand, liberals sometimes  HYPERLINK "" point out that despite doom-and-gloom prognostication, we live in the most " HYPERLINK "" peaceful era in human history.” And they cite statistics backing up the assertion. On the other, they claim we must suddenly accommodate endless troves of "refugees” fleeing persecution. Question: if the world is unprecedentedly peaceful, why now do we have a supposedly worse refugee crisis than in more warlike times?

There’s another contradiction. We’re told that prosperous countries have a moral responsibility to the world’s poorer nations. So why then are wealthy Asian Tigers never asked to absorb any "refugees”? Japan, in fact, has virtually no immigration whatsoever despite having an extremely low birthrate and shrinking population. Moreover, since many refugees are Muslim, why aren’t Saudi Arabia, Qatar, The United Arab Emirates and the other oil-rich Arab nations taking them in? Wouldn’t it seem a natural fit? (Then they could stop importing the Filipinos and others they use for domestic help.) Maybe they know something we don’t.

In a sense, most of the world could be said to comprise would-be economic refugees. After all, how many people in Asia, Africa and Latin America wouldn’t want to emigrate to the West and enjoy the welfare state? And how many should, and can, the West absorb? One billion? Two billion? Three billion?

There undoubtedly are people in this world facing serious persecution. As to this, the West in general and the Obama administration in particular have done nothing to aid, for instance, the Christians being slaughtered in Muslim lands. But the bottom line is that the "refugees” are coming to the West simply because the West is nicer than where they come from. And they will keep coming until they’ve turned the West into where they’ve come from — unless we change course.

There’s much talk today about anchor babies, but that’s only part of our obsession with granting citizenship to foreigners. Workers should be expected to work and go home. Guests should be expected to visit and go home. For whether or not you believe charity begins at home, for certain is that conflating it with family status is robbing us of our home
 HYPERLINK "" Contact Selwyn Duke

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:04 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1191 words, total size 9 kb.

Mark Steyn Nails It

Fay Voshell

I love this guy. Tells it like it is. No wonder National Review and he parted ways some time back.

"Your grandmother in the wheelchair has to lift up her skirt and show her colostomy bag to the TSA until the end of time. Your grandfather, who got blown up serving his country in a war and has a leg brace, has to be degraded and show that to officialdom at the airport until the end of time. But millions and millions of people can just walk into the selfsame country across the southern border, and we're supposed to just accept it."

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:52 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.

Christmas is Coming (Eventually)

Dana Mathewson

. . . and if you need some stocking stuffers, here's just the thing:

"RNC Selling Hillary-Branded 'Secret Server Wiper' - Tea ...
(Dily Caller) – The Republican National Committee is hitting Hillary Clinton as hard as possible over her recent joke about wiping her email server clean with...
View on"

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:52 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 1 kb.

Nine-point plan for Trump

Dana Mathewson

Whaddya think, guys?

"Wayne Allyn Root lays out nine solutions that Donald Trump should promise to fight for in that all-important first year as president of the United States."

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:51 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.

Some Adult & Kids books on Veterans PTSD

Jack Kemp

I'm working on updating my reading list of the latest writings on PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). It includes a book by a college professor in Southern Missisippi who visited the local VA hospital and invited some of the residents to come to his class, one of whom, a Vietnam vet, literally howled after seeing some films. The prof invited him back to help teach the course and his unit in Vietnam became the subject of the book "The Boys of '67." There is a National Geographic movie based on that book "Brothers In War."

There is also a YouTube video by Dr. Edward Tick, author of "Warrior's Return" which summarizes his 30 years of work with veterans' PTSD in a 97 minute online lecture given in Oregon which can be seen at ; He basically says that society has ignored the real costs (psychological, financial after-the-fact) of sending people to war. And so he works to have retreats in the country that welcome veterans home and where they can tell their stories.

And telling their stories to civilians is very helpful, being the main theme of the Welcome Johnny and Jane Home Project started by Paula Caplan, the daughter of an Army officer who fought in the Battle of the Bulge, leading an all-black artillery battery. You can hear her explain the Project in a seven minute YouTube talk at

Another first person story is that of the daughter of a Vietnam vet is Christal Presley's "Thirty Days with my Father: Finding Peace With Wartime PTSD," a very down to earth reactions of a now-grown daughter with her father and mother. Here below is an article about her reconnecting with her father.

I also found three children's books written by veterans about PTSD. Although the major brick and mortar bookstore, Barnes & Nobles, doesn't stock them on their shelves (and so I haven't seen them), the readers at, including at least one combat veteran, have a high opinion of these books.

Here they are with some some descriptive information:
Why Is Dad So Mad? (by Seth Kastle) is a story for children in military families whose father battles with combat related Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). After a decade fighting wars on two fronts, tens of thousands of service members are coming home having trouble adjusting to civilian life; this includes struggling as parents. Why Is Dad So Mad? Is a narrative story told from a family’s point of view (mother and children) of a service member who struggles with PTSD and its symptoms. Many service members deal with anger, forgetfulness, sleepless nights, and nightmares.This book explains these and how they affect Dad. The moral of the story is that even though Dad gets angry and yells, he still loves his family more than anything.
Why Is Mom So Mad? (by Seth and Julia Kastle) is a story for children in military families whose mother battles with combat related Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). After a decade fighting wars on two fronts, tens of thousands of service members are coming home having trouble adjusting to civilian life; this includes struggling as parents. Asymmetrical warfare has blurred the lines of women in combat roles, female veterans are impacted by this through current conflicts more than ever.
Why Is Mom So Mad? is a narrative story told from a family’s point of view (father and children) of a service member who struggles with PTSD and its symptoms. Many service members deal with anger, forgetfulness, sleepless nights, and nightmares.This book explains these and how they affect Mom. The moral of the story is that even though Mom gets angry and yells, she still loves her family more than anything.
My Daddy Has PTSD (by Casey Sean Harmon) is a simple story that follows a young boy as he learns that his combat veteran father has Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, or PTSD. The book asks the question, "What is wrong with Daddy?" and politely answers by saying, "Daddy is going through some things, but here's how we can help." Along with the character in the story, children of all ages will enjoy learning about common symptoms of PTSD.

Casey Sean Harmon spent seven years on a Unit Ministry Team in the U.S. Army, until a parachute accident left him with perminant disabilities. As a first responder both stateside and while deployed SGT Harmon witnessed the effects that PTSD has on Soldiers and their families. He wrote My Daddy Has PTSD for his son shortly after he himself was diagnosed with the disorder.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:27 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 775 words, total size 7 kb.

Miley Cyrus in the Bottomless Pit

Timothy Birdnow

Miley Cyrus, paragon of chaste modest virtues, has declared herself to be "pansexual".

She defined the meaning of that phrase:

"Cyrus spoke about identifying as gender fluid and her open view of sexuality last month in Paper magazine. "I am literally open to every single thing that is consenting and doesn't involve an animal."

End excerpt.

Our friends at Newsmachete go on to explain this is but a new word for bisexual, but I beg to differ; we must look at exactly what she did say. She said anything except acts involving animals. Sooo...

It means she is open to sodomizing young children. They are not animals (unless you are an animal rights type) and so Miley wants to rape little kids.

It means that she masturbates with mechanical devices.Also, fruits, vegetables, wax candles etc. Oh, and let us not neglect religious objects and whatnot.

It means she is open to copraphilia; she is willing to ingest urine, spittle, feces, menstual blood, and other bodily wastes, or wear them like suntan oil.

It means she is open to copulating with dead bodies. Hey, she won't have to worry about pregnancy! STD's, either, although she might catch some rot if the body isn't fresh enough.

It means she's open to sex with her father, or sister, or mother. I know her dad was a country music star, but they don't even do that in Arkansas anymore.

It means she will do it with someone who is mentally disabled. Parents had better lock up your Down's syndrome kids!

It means she participates in orgies/gangbangs.

It means she wants to tie someone down and beat them half to death, or be tied down and beaten raw. It means she wants her skin scraped off with a cheese grater. It means she wants to insert (or have inserted) massive objects that leave her or her partner incontinent.

It means, gentle reader, that she is a sick, disturbed, immoral, disgusting woman, a piece of filth. I wouldn't want to be in the same room as the former Hannah Montana star, lest I catch some horrible disease incubating in her rancid body parts.

It means that someone with powerful influence over young people is giving not just bad example but evil counsel. Miley is courting Satan, a neglected villain these days, but I wouldn't want to be in her shoes when she meets the grim reaper; she'll get all of these wonderful pansexual partners as her reward in this life, unless she repents.

I would say Miley is an animal but that would be an insult to animals everywehere. None behave as she advocates.

I fear Miley is symptomatic of a horrible disease that has infected America, and that this is the inevitable outcome of the sexual revolution. When sex becomes merely an act of pleasure there is no bottom to the pit. Every taboo must be broken, every filthy and vile action must be consummated lest the revolutionary become jaded. The most obscene things have become commonplace, and now, say, lesbian pornography is considered plain old vanilla; the edge is now the center. How long can one push the envelope before falling off the cliff?

God incinerated Sodom and Gemorrah for far less. America is a stink in the Divine nostrils. Is it any wonder we are in such a horrible state of decline?

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 09:10 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 567 words, total size 4 kb.

Black Lives Matter call for Lynching Whites

Zemir Begic and his fiance' Arijana Mujkanovic, victims of a black lynching

Timothy Birdnow

Ah, the spirit of Ferguson.

Apparently Black Lives Matter types are now calling for lynching of white people. A recent internet radio show hosted by "Sunshine", a Black Supremacist, featured repeated calls for lynchings by black people of whites. For example:

"An unidentified black man said "when those mother f**kers are by themselves, that’s when when we should start f***ing them up. Like they do us, when a bunch of them ni**ers takin’ one of us out, that’s how we should roll up.” He said, "Cause we already roll up in gangs anyway. There should be six or seven black mother f**ckers, see that white person, and then lynch their ass. Let’s turn the tables.”

They conspired that if "cops started losing people,” then "there will be a state of emergency.”

He speculated that one of two things would happen, "a big-ass [R’s?????] war,” or "ni**ers, they are going to start backin’ up.”

"We are already getting killed out here so what the f**k we got to lose?”

Sunshine could be heard saying, "Yep, that’s true. That’s so f**king true.”

He said, "We need to turn the tables on them. Our kids are getting shot out here. Somebody needs to become a sacrifice on their side.

He said, "Everybody ain’t down for that s**t, or whatever, but like I say, everybody has a different position of war.” He continued, "Because they don’t give a f**k anyway.” He said again, "We might as well utilized them for that s**t and turn the tables on these n**ers.”

He said, that way "we can start lookin’ like we ain’t havin’ that many casualties, and there can be more causalities on their side instead of ours.”

"They are out their killing black people, black lives don’t matter, that’s what those mother f**kers … so we got to make it matter to them.”

"Find a mother f**ker that is alone. Snap his ass, and then f***in hang him from a damn tree. Take a picture of it and then send it to the mother f**kers.”

We "just need one example,” and "then people will start watchin’.” This will turn the tables on s**t, he said. He said this will start "a trickle-down effect.” He said that when one white person is hung and then they are just "flat-hanging,” that will start the "trickle-down effect.” He continued, "Black people are good at starting trends.”

He said that was how "to get the upper-hand.”

End excerpt.

First, black thugs have been doing this for a long time with no results. Go to Colin Flaherty's website for innumerable examples, or read his books White Girls Bleed Alot or Don't Make the Black Kids Angry. (Anyone remember Zemir Begic and Arijana Mujkanovic, the Bosnian Man murdered by black juveniles in St. Louis?) All this lynching of white people has failed to accomplish the goals of Sunshine and these callers.

Second, do these fools really want a race war when they are outnumbered 5 to 1? As Michael Corleone says in The Godfather III "you sent a message, and now they have to send a message back". Whites have as yet to fight back against this, largely because there isn't this deep, vicious racism that black lives matter types believe, and because the media fails to report most black hate crimes out of fear of reprisal. BUT if these thugs start lynching isolated whites this could turn around very fast, especially once their advocate in the White House is no longer in power.

A race war would be a terrible thing. It would be the blacks who would suffer most if it ever really gets going. Contrary to what people like Sunshine believe, white people are not simply weak sheep to be devoured by the superior will of the Black Man. The Civil Rights movement did not seize power - as so many angry black people believe - but was given it by kindly whites, who felt that the treatment of African Americans in the past was disgraceful (and it was.) The Black Lives Matter gang believe they took power away from "whitey" by force of will, and they think they are the superiors because they are somehow tougher. That whites are the ones who conquered a continent, pushed out the Native Americans, and held their own ancestors (who worked like, well, slaves and were hard as iron) in bondage never occurs to these morons. Even if they ARE tougher than most whites, are they tougher than five of them put together? So much of the mystique of the tough ghetto black stems from preferential treatment by the Feds; if a white criminal kills a black one the F.B.I. comes in and the DOJ brings the wrath of the government down on the community. It's easy to be tough when you have white people fighting your battles.

Black Lives Matter couldn't exist without whitey. George Soros financed the whole assinine thing.

And if the caller to Sunshine's overcast show were truly interested in justice he wouldn't want the upper hand, but rather a handshake. How is "getting even" just? If you were mistreated do you redress it by mistreating someone else?

It is terrible to see what decades of preferential treatment masquerading as "civil rights" has done to America. We are more divided, more at each-other's throats, than ever.

Rush Limbaugh, discussing the black reporter who murdered a reporter and cameraman while on-air, pointed out that affirmative action inevitably leads to this sort of thinking; Vestus Flannery saw every disappointment, every failure, everything in his life as stemming from his victimhood. He had no choice, because otherwise he would have been forced to take a hard look at himself and would realize that he was pushed along, well beyond where his talents and abilities would have taken him, and that his frustration and anger came not from white racism or homophobia but from his own shortcomings. He wasn't going to do that. He had to blame others for his own problems. That is what affirmative action does, it is a crutch to lean upon, and offers excuses for failure.

Nobody wants to think they aren't that good, but life isn't fair to anybody. The very rich, contrary to the beliefs of many poor or even middle-class people, have their problems too, and often feel they do not measure up. They often don't. Life isn't easy for anybody. If you had a fairy godmother who could magically transform you from a poor farmhand into a rich planter, you would simply exchange one set of problems for another. You may be glad to be rid of the old set, but you aren't going to like the new ones. At any rate, people generally aren't happy with their lot in life, and nobody likes to fail, but so often we do. A wise person learns from their failure and soldiers on. Abraham Lincoln is a classic example; the man failed at everything he tried, and yet ended up as one of America's greatest presidents. Then too, the man would never have made it in Hollywood, and one must accept one's own limitations. I'll never play pro basketball...

But what the liberals have done is sharpen people's ambitions to the point where they expect great success, fame, wealth, and they want it now. They see themselves as entitled. This is a malady affecting small children, and when we see it there we call them spoiled brats. Now a large swath of America has become spoiled brats. The Black Lives Matter crowd are a classic example.

Pope Paul VI said "if you want peace, work for justice". It is an oversimplification, but it should be taken to heart by everyone these days. Black Lives Matter do not want peace or justice. They are the tyranny of evil men, as bad as the slave takers and Bull Connor types. Under the skin they are indistinguishable.

We all should do better.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:40 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 1345 words, total size 10 kb.

August 28, 2015

Obamacare Food Fight

Image result for food fight

Dana Mathewson

Here's pie in your eye. Wanna bet the First Wookie's behind all this?

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 08:15 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 19 words, total size 21 kb.

August 27, 2015

It's a Grand Old Flag

Timothy Birdnow

White, straight hating murderer Vester Flanagan wanted a race war. According to ABC News courtesy of Breitbart:

"As for Dylann Roof? You (deleted)! You want a race war (deleted)? BRING IT THEN YOU WHITE …(deleted)!!!” He said Jehovah spoke to him, telling him to act.”

Later in the manifesto, the writer quotes the Virginia Tech mass killer, Seung Hui Cho, and calls him "his boy,” and expresses admiration for the Columbine High School killers. "Also, I was influenced by Seung–Hui Cho. That’s my boy right there. He got NEARLY double the amount that Eric Harris and Dylann Klebold got…just sayin’.

In an often rambling letter to the authorities, and family and friends, he writes of a long list of grievances. In one part of the document, Williams calls it a "Suicide Note for Friends and Family”.

–He says has suffered racial discrimination, sexual harassment and bullying at work.

–He says he has been attacked by black men and white females.

–He talks about how he was attacked for being a gay, black man

End excerpt.

A hate symbol was found in Flanagan's apartment, an anti-Christian bigoted rainbow flag. Since Dylan Roof was supposedly motivated by the Confederate flag, a so-called hate symbol, then we must ask how much this hateful rainbow flag motivated Flanagan.

They don't call it the Lavender Mafia for no reason.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 11:10 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 231 words, total size 3 kb.

Ethiopian Space Program

Timothy Birdnow

ETHIOPIA is establishing a space program!

Their plan is to launch a satellite within five years. What are they going to send up? A rock?

I guess they'll launch it with a big blow gun and lots of peasants exhaling at once.

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 11:07 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 48 words, total size 3 kb.

Guns don't Kill People, Journalists Do! An Act of Drive-by Journalism

Timothy Birdnow

Vester Flanagan (wasn't this guy a character on the Adams Family?) was a gay activist and a devout Democrat who was written up for wearing a Barack Obama sticker to work - at a supposedly unbiased news outlet. He was also unable to get along with his coworkers, and complained of both racial and sexual harassment after he was fired (and had to have the police called to escort him out.)

He had also been filmed in a case of road rage a while back.

Despite all this, and the fact that this guy was one of their own, the media is trying to launch this into a gun control effort.

To paraphrase an old NRA slogan "guns don't kill people, journalists kill people!" or if you prefer "liberal Democrats kill people."

Rush Limbaugh refers to the media as "the drive-by media" because of their hit and run terror tactics on conservatives and others they do not like. Well, they are now turning from acts of journalistic malfeasance to actual drive-by shootings.

I wonder if the Department of Homeland Security has any position papers warning police and national security forces about the dangers of random acts of violence by journalists as they are forever warning about returning veterans, people with Gadsden flags, pro-life people, and other conservatives as potential domestic terrorists? What does Mark Potok at the Southern Poverty Law Center have to say about journalists? He is quick to call any conservatives domestic terrorists (while his devotees are the ones who have done the terrorism, as was the case withthe attack on the Family Research Council.) Potok has valiantly protected us from such evil groups as the American College of Pediatricians, the Family Research Council, the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, the U.S. Border Guard, Pamela Geller's Atlas Shrugged, Tea Party Nation, and I believe, the Catholic cloistering Pink Sisters.

And yet another radical liberal activist committs a horrible crime and it is the fault of guns.

Maybe gun control should start with liberals; if you register as a Democrat you should be denied a concealed carry permit - you are clearly mentally unstable.

Meanwhile, Jeb Bush told a group of his natural constituents - the media - that they deserve to be treated with greater respect than Donald Trump has shown to Jorge Ramos. How's that working out for everyone?

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 10:02 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 406 words, total size 4 kb.

August 26, 2015

Loser Lunch Lady

Image result for michelle obama as far out space nuts

Wil Wirtanen

The big Zerobama can’t run a lemonade stand and looks like Michelle couldn’t run a picnic.


Reminds me of the old Sid and Marty Kroft production "Far Out Space Nuts" where Bob Denver (aka Gilligan) pressed the launch button on the Apollo when he was supposed to check "lunch".

Image result for far out space nutsImage result for far out space nuts

Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at 02:40 PM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 59 words, total size 16 kb.

<< Page 1 of 540 >>
126kb generated in CPU 0.04, elapsed 0.0442 seconds.
30 queries taking 0.0083 seconds, 181 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.